Ways to migrate AEM 6.5, compared
There is no single right answer. This table is our view of when each option fits, including when you should not hire us.
| In-house + Adobe tools | Large SI | AEM agency | Our pipeline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Who does the work | Your developers | Large delivery teams | Specialist AEM engineers | Agents for repetitive changes, senior engineers for design and review |
| Uses Adobe's free tools (BPA, CAM, migration skill) | Yes | Usually, plus own accelerators | Usually | Yes, inside a wider pipeline |
| Price model | Internal cost | Typically time and materials | Varies | Free two-week Blueprint, then a fixed price |
| Estate-wide fact collection | Manual | Varies by accelerator | Varies | Deterministic and repeatable |
| Every change reviewed by a human | Your process | Your contract | Your contract | Yes, each PR approved by a named engineer |
| Audit trail of AI changes | None by default | Varies | Varies | Append-only log in your repository |
| Best when | Small estate, strong in-house AEM skills | Migration is one part of a larger transformation | You want a long-term AEM partner | You want a fixed price and speed for a defined migration |
Our speed target, stated plainly
We designed the pipeline to deliver migrations three to five times faster and cheaper than a conventional manual approach for the same scope, by letting agents do the pattern-based changes. That is a design target. We are a new company and do not yet have customer results to publish; we will add them here with each client's permission.
Free, runs in your browser
How much of your AEM 6.5 code needs to change?
Drop in a Best Practices Analyzer CSV or a zip of your repository. Files are read locally and never uploaded.
Run the readiness scan